MIDRANGE dot COM Mailing List Archive



Home » MIDRANGE-L » January 2013

Re: BRMS - full save with least amount of restricted time



fixed

Yes, but that does not get quite to the bare metal back up a Winders box does while it's running. The fact that recoverability is at best questionable is of no matter.

The problem we run into with these discussions is comparing two completely different architectures with each other. Folks want the good part of a old file based technology (Windows) they spend serious money supporting to avoid things we just take for granted on IBM i. So the best route is to exit stage left, and not bother with the discussion since there is no way to convince the Windows aficionado's that Windows technology is inferior to start with, therefore not comparable.

Exiting stage left.....

Jim Oberholtzer
Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects


On 1/22/2013 1:01 PM, rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(r) Pro*
Are you comfortable enough with this?
Using save-while-active with network server storage spaces
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/iseries/v7r1m0/topic/rzaiu/rzaiusavewhileactivestoragespace.htm?resultof=%22%71%66%70%6e%77%73%73%74%67%22%20
With that in mind you should be able to do a save while active of a
guested lpar.

I'm no SAN guru on doing back up's that way (if possible).

Isn't there some newer BRMS feature to work with a snapshot of the system?



Rob Berendt





Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2014 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact