|
Joe Pluta skrev den 27-04-2008 04:47:This is the part perhaps that David was suggesting we move, although I don't know where. JAVA400-L really isn't appropriate because neither XML nor JSON require Java. XML is language-agnostic and JSON pertains specifically to JavaScript more than anything. I suppose WEB400-L, although both formats are used for non-web applications as well.
If you're not doing industry compliant, you don't do SOAP. In fact, most non-web service environments no longer use XML at all, instead they use JSON, because it's more efficient.This is a very interesting statement. Would you happen to know a good[1] web page with comparative benchmarks of XML and JSON?
[1] "Good" is the primary reason why I don't just search for it :)
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.