|
I don't know what you guys are talking about, there isn't a "way PC products are installed". As if everyone does it the same standard way. Some software comes with a 3rd party installer, some use .msi files (or yet another installer by MS), some you have to extract into a folder. And the installer thing usually is different for each vendor. It just isn't that difficult to install RDi. I've done it a bunch of times on different PC's. If you download the demo, it comes with an installer, and you just run it. It would be nice if IBM removed the Admin requirement.
Mark Murphy
Atlas Data Systems
mmurphy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----j.beckeringh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: -----
To: Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client for System i & iSeries <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: j.beckeringh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 03/08/2017 08:45AM
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] RDi way ahead
Now if only someone at IBM would take the trouble of explaining to all of
us WHY the whole thing with Installation Manager is superior to what the
rest of the industry does. Then either he or she could finally make us
understand (and stop complaining about it), or come to the insight that
maybe it wasn't such a great idea after all (and do something about it).
Joep Beckeringh
Pantheon Automatisering B.V.
Greg Wilburn <gwilburn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
08-03-2017 14:33
Re: [WDSCI-L] RDi way ahead
I must have missed the original post by Tim... the second paragraph
is hilarious. I have often thought the same thing.
I'm sure the RDi team does a good job and I don't suppose any of the
developers went to their boss one day and said "You know how much we
hate our users right? Well, instead of just having our software
install like any other piece of PC software, why not create our own
'installation manager'
which we can use to make installation, updating and licencing really
painful, that will really antagonise them!" Or "Boss, you know how
the IBM i is struggling to attract new talent and persuade people to
use up-do-date tools, well why not raise the barrier to entry even
higher by charging a small fortune for them?"
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.