Re: Poll of users of live ILE RPG outline view

1C2B
Would it be too hard to have named indicators in both places?
Thanks for the survey!
Yours truly,
Glenn Gundermannglenn.gundermann@xxxxxxxxx (416) 317-3144-------- Original message --------From: Edmund Reinhardt <edmund.reinhardt@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: 2016-04-08 3:56 PM (GMT-05:00) To: WDSC <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [WDSCI-L] Poll of users of live ILE RPG outline view

Since you are the active community in support of this product, you get to
have the power to help me make design decisions.
I have received feedback on two issues about indicators and how they used
to behave differently with the static outline then they do now with the
live outline.

1) Named indicators now appear under the Indictors heading when they used
to appear under fields as just another named field with indicator type.
People have complained and want to have only the numbered indicators until
the Indicators heading.

2) Numbered indicators used to appear in numerical order which was easier
to find, now they appear in the order that they occurred in the source
(similar to all the other declarations).

I have 3 options.
A) I can change to the original behaviour with no preferences.
B) I can add a preference, but set it to the original behaviour (so people
will see the product change to the original behaviour when this is
released)
C) I can add a preference and set it to the current behaviour

So submit your votes to me

A vote of
1A
2A

Means named indicators will now appear under fields and numbered indicators
will appear in numeric order - no additional preferences

A vote of
1C
2C
Means the product will behave just as it does today, but there will be 2
additional preferences that will enable the old behaviour

Vote away, let your voice be heard :-)

Edmund