1A
2A
I would agree with changing the data type reference from indictor to Boolean.
-----Original Message-----
message: 5
date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 07:29:46 -0400
from: "Mark Murphy/STAR BASE Consulting Inc."
<mmurphy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] Poll of users of live ILE RPG outline view
1c2b
If you are going to have an indicators section, all indicators should be there, except those that are inside a data structure. But indicators are really just booleans right? Maybe it is time to adjust our terminology to match the times, and put the named indicators in with the fields (but call them booleans rather than indicators). I guess the compiler team would also have to agree to that to maintain consistency.
Mark Murphy
STAR BASE Consulting, Inc.
mmurphy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----"Edmund Reinhardt" <edmund.reinhardt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: -----
To: WDSC <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Edmund Reinhardt" <edmund.reinhardt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 04/08/2016 04:11PM
Subject: [WDSCI-L] Poll of users of live ILE RPG outline view
Since you are the active community in support of this product, you get to
have the power to help me make design decisions.
I have received feedback on two issues about indicators and how they used
to behave differently with the static outline then they do now with the
live outline.
1) Named indicators now appear under the Indictors heading when they used
to appear under fields as just another named field with indicator type.
People have complained and want to have only the numbered indicators until
the Indicators heading.
2) Numbered indicators used to appear in numerical order which was easier
to find, now they appear in the order that they occurred in the source
(similar to all the other declarations).
I have 3 options.
A) I can change to the original behaviour with no preferences.
B) I can add a preference, but set it to the original behaviour (so people
will see the product change to the original behaviour when this is
released)
C) I can add a preference and set it to the current behaviour
So submit your votes to me
A vote of
1A
2A
Means named indicators will now appear under fields and numbered indicators
will appear in numeric order - no additional preferences
A vote of
1C
2C
Means the product will behave just as it does today, but there will be 2
additional preferences that will enable the old behaviour
Vote away, let your voice be heard :-)
Edmund
--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at
http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.
******************************************************************
"Notice: This e-mail and any files transmitted are confidential and may also be privileged. This communication is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are the intended recipient of this information, please treat it as confidential information and take all necessary action to keep it secure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, forwarding, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender at once by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message."
******************************************************************
midrange.com
