× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Hi Edmund,

I would like to see *IN indicators under "Indicators" and named indicators under "Fields". Named indicators are just boolean fields and *IN indicators are specific to RPG. That is my feeling. I do not need a preference to change that. So I guess that is:

1A

Numbered indicators appear in numerical order with my RDi 9.5.0.2. So I do not understand your point 2). I expected to see them ordered as *in02, *in01 and *in03 for the following test source:

h main(main)

d main pr

p main b
d pi
/free

*in02 = *off;
*in03 = *off;
*in01 = *off;

/end-free
p e

But in fact they appear in numerical order (*in01 -> 11 (M), *in02 -> 9 (M) and *in03 -> 10 (M)), which is exactly what I want to have. So I guess that is:

2A

Thank you for the survey.

Regards,

Thomas.


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: WDSCI-L [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Edmund Reinhardt
Gesendet: Freitag, 8. April 2016 21:56
An: WDSC
Betreff: [WDSCI-L] Poll of users of live ILE RPG outline view


Since you are the active community in support of this product, you get to have the power to help me make design decisions.
I have received feedback on two issues about indicators and how they used to behave differently with the static outline then they do now with the live outline.

1) Named indicators now appear under the Indictors heading when they used to appear under fields as just another named field with indicator type.
People have complained and want to have only the numbered indicators until the Indicators heading.

2) Numbered indicators used to appear in numerical order which was easier to find, now they appear in the order that they occurred in the source (similar to all the other declarations).

I have 3 options.
A) I can change to the original behaviour with no preferences.
B) I can add a preference, but set it to the original behaviour (so people will see the product change to the original behaviour when this is
released)
C) I can add a preference and set it to the current behaviour

So submit your votes to me

A vote of
1A
2A

Means named indicators will now appear under fields and numbered indicators will appear in numeric order - no additional preferences

A vote of
1C
2C
Means the product will behave just as it does today, but there will be 2 additional preferences that will enable the old behaviour

Vote away, let your voice be heard :-)

Edmund
--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.
--
IMPORTANT NOTICE:
This email is confidential, may be legally privileged, and is for the intended recipient only. Access, disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance on any of it by anyone else is prohibited and may be a criminal offence. Please delete if obtained in error and email confirmation to the sender.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.