|
What do you do about paying JBA extra license fees and getting auth codes for the second box...? I doubt they would look favorably on giving them to you for free... Dan Thomas <DThomas@lpw-mdi.com> on 12/19/2000 02:58:36 PM Please respond to JBAUSERS-L@midrange.com To: "'JBAUSERS-L@midrange.com'" <JBAUSERS-L@midrange.com> cc: (bcc: Jeff Klipa/Harvard) Subject RE: Creating a Test Company based on Live : Company Files Is a second small server for testing not a cost effective option for most companies? Dan Thomas Sr. VP Information Systems MDI 4500 Progress Blvd. Louisville, KY 40218-5058 Phone (502) 454-9013 ext. 120 www.mdiweb.com -----Original Message----- From: Duncan, Helen (MacGas) [mailto:DuncanH2@bp.com] Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 6:51 AM To: 'JBAUSERS-L@midrange.com' Subject: RE: Creating a Test Company based on Live Company Files Instead of using test companies on the same files as the live data, we have created a duplicate set of files prefixed TST instead of OSL. We have set up 2 different test environments: TSP (production test environment - which mimics live environment) and TSD (development test environment which contains changes & fixes for testing). We have set up separate user profiles to access the test environments and we have written programs to populate the test files with cut down copies of the live files using CPYF. Care needs to be taken that there is no activity on the live system when the test system is re-generated - otherwise the invoice & order numbers get out of sync. This was quite labour-intensive to set up, but it works well. Helen > ---------- > From: plynch@sunflowermfg.com[SMTP:plynch@sunflowermfg.com] > Reply To: JBAUSERS-L@midrange.com > Sent: 14 December 2000 20:50 > To: JBAUSERS-L@midrange.com > Subject: Creating a Test Company based on Live Company Files > > Sunflower needs to syncronize the test environment with the live > environment on a weekly basis. > This need is extremely critical right now because we're testing SP3 for > 3.5.2b. > > Does anyone out there have, or know of, a utility that performs this task > cleanly? > > Currently we have a program that runs a series of SQL statements that does > most of the job but it is not clean enough or reliable enough to permit a > full blown test. Part of the issue is the fact that not all files prefix > their company number fields with "CONO". During the copy we convert the > live company number to a different test company number so users are fully > aware when they are in the test environment. > > We'd like to run the live and test side as close to parallel as possible > to > facilitate efficient testing of this, and subsequent, service packs. > Having > a reliable utility for this would really cut down on some of the pain of > uplifting. > > Patricia Lynch > Sunflower Mfg. Co., Inc. > AS/400 Applications Mgr. +--- | This is the JBA Software Users Mailing List! | To submit a new message send your mail to JBAUSERS-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to JBAUSERS-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to JBAUSERS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: doug333@aol.com. +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.