|
You say something that is unclear to me.
Lets say Moore's Law is still in effect, which seems to still be the case.
What is the effect of a 50% drop in revenue per transistor, every 18 months, over a couple of decades? Doesn't there have to be a point where increasing sales can no longer be sustained?
I don't understand? Why would a cheaper manufacturing cost of transistors slow iSeries sales? If anything, if it was cheaper to manufacture IBM should be able to sell more units at a reduced cost by passing the savings on to the customer. Personally, I think what has killed sales is the perception of the platform being a dinosaur, and IBM's constant rebranding of things to the point that even if the customer wanted to jump onboard he doesn't even know where to start.
I love the 400, it's a good, solid, dependable platform and writing RPG is a breeze. Interfacing to the non-IBM world is a little tricky, but doable. I do my part, I tell anyone who asks what I do that I work on the best platform in the world - unfortunately, 90% of them have no idea what the AS/400/iSeries/System i is. I think it's about time for IBM to do their part and sell, sell, sell the damn platform until the next time someone asks me what I do, and I say I program on the iSeries, that person tells me how he's heard so much good buzz about it that I must be a lucky man indeed! =)
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.