|
> The anti-cyclists still use the cycle. They just don't understand it. Speaking as one who thinks that he understands it but doesn't use it unless it's an existing program that needs modification I have to ask--Is it a cycle program if LR is set on before it iterates (i.e. is it top-tested or bottom-tested)? If it's bottom-tested then it would never "cycle" back to test LR. It would test it at the bottom, find it on, and end. Thus, it wouldn't technically be a cycle program. If I had to guess I would say that it is top-tested in which case you would be right and all programs would be cycle programs. If not, then it would be a cycle-capable program. This getting a bit nitpicky. Dave Parnin -- Nishikawa Standard Company Topeka, IN 46571 daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
