|
Personally I wouldn't be so quick to rule out CODE in anticipation of wdsc. At work, I envoke code via PDM. Works great. When I used to work from home, I used CPO daily. Works great. I excitedly installed WDSC 4.0 on my PC only to be disappointed. 4.0 is really 1.0. I don't have 5.0 (really 2.0) in my hands yet so I can't comment much on it. It took me a day of tinkering to get up to speed on CODE to be productive, with a lot of help from Buck and the CODE IBM'ers on the CODE400-L list. After many months, maybe a year, of 4.0 I'm still not productive enough to use it daily. Partly because my PC doesn't have enough power. I'll try again once those 5.0 cd's come in. But, as I do my hobby programming at home and I run linux at home I don't see me adopting 5.0 in a hurry. At work I just don't have that much time to tinker. One gripe about the help: WDTS 5.1 had the best help. The help with WDSC 4.0 sucks. John Larimer posted a really great macro in Jan (I think) that helps open help contextually but the help text itself is so basic it isn't much help at all. Just my .02 Phil
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.