Re: RPG400-L Digest, Vol 2, Issue 421

[sublime78ska@xxxxxxxxx]

>Amen!
>
>And while we're at it, let me once again beg for qualified procedure
>calls. I'm tired of having to assign meaningless prefixes to my
>procedure names in the hope that they won't conflict with existing code
>at customer sites. Since so few sites actually use ILE, this has been
>workable so far, but I don't expect my luck to hold out forever.

Ran into this myself - with my own code!  What I do is name all of my exported
procedures the name of the module + the procedure.  ADR106_myProc()

phil

>
>If you think about it, what are you going to do when you release a
>service pgm with procedure xxMyProc(), only to find some other vendor
>had the same naming convention, and your customer now can't use those
>service programs together. If we ever reach widespread use of ILE,
>things are going to get ugly.
>
>
>
>Regards,
>
>John Taylor