× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Half of those people, or more, wouldn't allow you to put a PTF on their
machine to get the fix anyway.  Their mentality is "don't change anything
that isn't broke".  Ok so now you can develop from your older release to a
newer release.  But you still can't use the new feature because you don't
know which customers have the ptf installed or not.  Or are you expecting
the compiler people to be like the CASE tool vendors.  Take a nice pretty
construct and dumb it down into something supported on ancient versions of
the operating system.  For example, let's say your CASE vendor takes SELECT
and dumbs it down into a crapload of nested if's.

Rob Berendt
--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin



                    Tom Daly
                    <Tdaly@sddsystems       To:     "'rpg400-l@midrange.com'" 
<rpg400-l@midrange.com>
                    .com>                   cc:
                    Sent by:                Fax to:
                    rpg400-l-admin@mi       Subject:     RE: question on survey 
question
                    drange.com


                    02/19/2002 11:17
                    AM
                    Please respond to
                    rpg400-l






> Bill said:
 |
 |  PS:  and as a software developer who constantly has to code
 |  something
 |  multiple times to satisfy customers who are various releases of our
 |  software, my answer will be a resounding NO!  <g>
 |

I think having the ability to target multiple OS releases with a single
compiler would be great!  A fair portion of 'customization' work on our
newer code relates to back level compatibility.  Just because a customer
doesn't move their OS ahead doesn't mean that they shouldn't be able to
take
advantage of newer language enhancements... unless there's some OS specific
change.

I don't like coding something multiple times - like undoing EVALR code or
%DIV and %REM into RPG III style code.

Tom

_______________________________________________
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.







As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.