|
Bob, I need to see your possible answers and don't really see where your "thinking" is going to make the question clearer. If you expect a yes or no, the question is fine, but I doubt you will have gained any useful insight. Are you actually trying to sway opinion by asking a question (push-polling) here? If you are, I would be more direct, something like: "In your development environment is it important for IBM to support prior releases, and if so how far back should IBM support?" The iSeries-toolkit Web site (http://www.iseries-toolkit.org) supports releases back to V4R4 directly, and provides a build program that will recompile usefully back to V3R2. That is the advantage of open source. People can build what their system supports. The V4R4 download is the most popular (about 40%) with the remainder split between the V4R5 and V5R1 downloads. David Morris >>> cozzi@rpgiv.com 02/19/02 08:28AM >>> In next week's Midrange Developer, my 10-second survey is going to be something like this: Should IBM be required to base all future versions of the compilers on V5R1, thus allowing future code to be compiled as TGTRLS(*V5R1M0)? My question to you all is this: Is this a viable question, and is it clear enough?
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.