RE: question on survey question

["Bob Cozzi \(RPGIV\)" <cozzi@xxxxxxxxx>]

It does allow for discussion and rebuttal.

But I'm suggesting the source code would compile on *PRV releases, even
with the new function. Unless that function was someone interfacing with
a component outside of the compiler, like an API that isn't back-ported
via PTF or whatever.

Bob Cozzi
cozzi@rpgiv.com
Visit the on-line  Midrange  Developer  forum at: http://www.rpgiv.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rpg400-l-admin@midrange.com [mailto:rpg400-l-admin@midrange.com]
On
> Behalf Of bmorris@ca.ibm.com
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 11:10 AM
> To: rpg400-l@midrange.com
> Subject: RE: question on survey question
>
>
> >From: "Bob Cozzi \(RPGIV\)" <cozzi@rpgiv.com>
> >Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 10:04:51 -0600
> >
> >Again, I'm not looking for votes one way or the other, I'm looking
for
> >help on the wording of the question to avoid confusion.
>
> Bob, one big reason the TGTRLS compilers don't allow new function is
> that some people send source code along with their product.  If that
> code won't actually compile on the customer's machine, everyone
> would be unhappy.
>
> (You can't control thread drift in a forum.  Anyway, presumably your
> survey won't allow discussion.)
>
> Barbara Morris
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing
list
> To post a message email: RPG400-L@midrange.com
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l
> or email: RPG400-L-request@midrange.com
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.