|
Now I see what you're saying. Although I can think of a few exceptions, most customers who will shell out the money for the source are going to do their PTFs and stay fairly current on OS releases. As a developer I think it would be great to be able to target multiple OS releases (not necessarily OS versions) with a single source and use the latest language enhancements. So if not for the source issue, what do you think? Tom | -----Original Message----- | From: rob@dekko.com [mailto:rob@dekko.com] | Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 15:58 | Subject: RE: question on survey question | | The PTF would come into play because the customer would | want the source | code. They would want to compile it on their dinosaur of a | machine. In | order to get this new release of the compiler, the minimum | you'd have to do | is apply a PTF. Many customers would pitch a fit because | they don't put | ptf's on for the same reason that they don't put releases on. | | Rob Berendt
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.