|
I have a firm grip and an accurate grasp. IBM has to see a need to change their marketing and pricing strategy before they can be expected to do so. Currently they don't see a need, Wintel is so popular that folks come to IBM in search of those boxes. The demand for those systems means that IBM can justify expending effort in marketing, developing and innovating for them. IBM will not invest those same resources in the AS/400 because the potential return is low and the potential for return is even lower. Why does IBM think that their return will be greater in the PC arena, a better question would be why is their return greater because we all know it is. Is it that those boxes are so much more stable that a business can't survive without one? No. The reason can be boiled down to the fact that there is more low cost software available for those platforms. Now, if suddenly there were a comparable number of low cost apps (of all kinds) available for the AS/400 then you would see an increase in the demand for the box over a period of time. Point is, if we [AS/400 programmers] made as much noise as those fanatics on the other platforms IBM's eyes would snap open. The low demand for the AS/400 contributes to IBM's un-willingness to invest resources in marketing the AS/400 it is as simple as that. It would be much more expensive for IBM to attract new customers to a more expensive platform than for them to just watch the market and see that everyone wants low investment solutions and hop on for the ride. However, if there were someway we could increase the demand for AS/400's to a tenth the fever pitch linux has achieved, the sleeper would surely awaken. Your nuts if you think IBM would hesitate to change its marketing of the AS/400 if it saw potentially higher margins. IBM is not trying to cut the AS/400 out of its plans as far as I can tell, but they must be trying to minimize liability. If the AS/400 becomes a liability then you can be sure it will be history. So what are you gonna do, sit back and watch it happen or contribute in whatever small way possible to help ensure that it doesn't happen? I know which path I choose. For every one here that is satisfied with the status quo there is at least one who is disgusted and there is no harm in making the effort to bring about positive change. eric.delong@pmsi-services.com wrote: > > Leslie, > > Get a grip. Many of the folks on this list have as much love for -- L. S. Russell Programmer/Analyst Datrek Professional Bags, Inc. 2413 Industrial Drive Springfield, TN. 37172 mailto:leslier@datrek.com http://www.datrek.com -- +--- | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.