RE: Is DB2/400 still the correct terminology fo DB2 on the IBM i?

I'll dig it out of my memos.
Jim


-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of PaultinNZ
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:58 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Is DB2/400 still the correct terminology fo DB2 on the IBM i?

Jim,

Could you share that " ... the memo for management to understand how to explain our system ​"​ ?

I was just discussing this with a couple of colleagues yesterday and still battle getting people to change.

Would appreciate that.

Thanks
Paul

On 23 September 2015 at 14:47, midrange <franz9000@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

DB2/400 is ancient. So is DB2 for i5/OS and DB2 UDB (Universal
Database) for iSeries

It is "DB2 for i " (at least for V7.1 and 7.2 - over 5 years) although
if I am ever talking to a non-Power i person, a trading partner, I
call it just "DB2".

Home page
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/power/software/i/db2/

IBM has many DB2 products for various platforms

DB2 for Linux, Unix and Windows
DB2 on Cloud
DB2 for i <so what is wrong with this name?>
DB2 for z/OS
DB2 Server for VSE & VM
DB2 Spatial Extender for Linux, Unix and Windows Spatial Support for
DB2 for z/OS
DB2 BLU Acceleration

DB2 was originally IBM Database 2 in 1983 for MVS mainframe We have
thousands of customers accessing our system via a web interface (C#
and Win front end). No one calls it "AS/400" - management forbids it
(potential customers turn away or label us as "old" if we do). It is
"Power i " and the database is DB2.. I wrote the memo for management
to understand how to explain our system. Even 20 year employees get
it... we replaced an old floor model (a Power 5) with a rack system
(Power 7+), called it "Power i", and it's "new!".
Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Glenn Gundermann
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 7:19 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Is DB2/400 still the correct terminology fo DB2 on the IBM i?

Same here.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry Draper <midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: "MIDRANGE-L" <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx>Date: Tue, 22
Sep
2015
15:12:29
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion<midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
<midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Is DB2/400 still the correct terminology fo DB2 on the IBM i?

We just call it an IBM I and refer to the database as db2.

Jerry



--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take
a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

--
Paul Tormey
3/11 Bramley Drive
Farm Cove
Auckland
2012
New Zealand
Home: 09 576 3415 or 0064 9 576 3415
Mobile: 021 810615 or 0064 21810615
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.