Scott Forstie, a DB2 developer, spoke at our user group last year.  It was referred to as "IBM DB2 for i" or just "DB2 for i".

Personally, I cringe every time I hear "AS400" or "the 400" due to the negative inferences people make.


Roger Harman
COMMON Certified Application Developer – ILE RPG on IBM i on Power
OCEAN User Group
<http://www.ocean400.org>






----------------------------------------
From: zippy1981@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 20:30:57 +0000
Subject: Is DB2/400 still the correct terminology fo DB2 on the IBM i?
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx

I had the great pleasure of being a a SUG where Trevor Perry made it quite
clear that AS/400 and iSeries were no longer acceptable terms (unless your
dealing with older hardware of course). I also see on the IBM page its
referred to as *IBM DB2 for i*. That's a bit of a mouthful.

Is DB2/400 still considered acceptable? Should I say DB2 for i when I want
to be brief?

Justin
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].