I was talking to an IBM BP guy (former IBM Systems Engineer) a few weeks
ago, and he told me that except in the great big shops, there are almost
zero IBM employees doing hardware maintenance anymore.
They've either retired, or were RIF'ed. Many have gone to work for outfits
like HP. The Silverlake product family has gotten so reliable that there's
just no need for a big staff of "mechanics" standing by, not to mention that
most of the moving parts are now customer installable.
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of bll1981
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 1:26 PM
Subject: HP support of IBM Power hardware
I realize this may sound radical to the iSeries community, but my company is
exploring a hardware maintenance contract change to HP. So this will mean
the hardware maintenance support functions for our Power5/6/7 systems would
be handled by HP, not IBM (hardware only). I have my own feelings about
and I am sure you all feel the same. Regardless, I am just trying to poll
community for any other customers who currently use HP for their IBM i
maintenance support. If so, please give me a little feedback relative to
performance vs. traditional IBM hardware support.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact