RE: Re: Failure to permanently apply ptf's prior to an upgrade

midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

>   1. Re: Failure to permanently apply ptf's prior to an upgrade
>      (Sue Baker)
>
> wrote on Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:36:56 GMT:
>
>> Object      Object    Object      Creation
>>             Type      Attribute   Date 
>> QSF56133J1  *FILE     SAVF         042299 
>> QSF56133J2  *FILE     SAVF         042299 
>> QSF56133J3  *FILE     SAVF         042299 
>> 
>
>It's been a while since I ran into this sitution, but I'm pretty 
>sure that if you do a DLTPTF SF56133 it will take care of these 
>three files.  You can do the same for the remaining ones on your 
>list and it will clean things up in a similar manner.


I haven't done it much either and not recently. But I seem to recall the DLTPTF 
can be very picky. For PTF savefile objects that are leftover from previous 
releases, I think it needs to be told explicitly the correct ProductId _and_ 
the correct VRM.

Perhaps a DSPPTF *ALL *ALL *ALL to an *OUTFILE will list enough info that a 
useful DLTPTF command can be entered?

Tom Liotta