|
I would add: the question probably hinges on what EXACTLY *IS* possible. The theory being the inverse of my previous argument. If "affordable and as easy as green-screen was possible", it would already exist. If you buy my argument that LANSA, MRC, BCD, Cool, Seagull, Jacada, (yada, yada, yada...;-) DON'T exhibit these qualities and/or are NOT "affordable" --> it must not be possible. If it was possible, then these ISVs would be marketing it already. (OR they just don't see a market where I see one, but that's pretty hard to believe.) Let me save a lot of time arguing: the proof is in the pudding. I can disprove the argument, totally and completely, only by providing a product that does this. What I'm doing is "market research" on the cheap. BTW, if that's a conflict of interest with your employer, Janet, I'm willing to deal. (Now, off to tilt with some more windmills: slay the myth of the advantages of OSS development methodology... I don't know if I'm brave, and/or just plain foolhardy... LOL...!) jt "Have a GREAT day...! And a BETTER ONE TOMORROW~~~:-)" (sm) > -----Original Message----- > From: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com > [mailto:midrange-l-admin@midrange.com]On Behalf Of jt > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:53 PM > To: midrange-l@midrange.com > Subject: RE: OO benefits? (was Re: Fast400 Value to iSeries community is > less than zero ) > > > Janet, Joe > > Thank you both for your replies. > > I wouldn't phrase it that way, myself, Joe. My reply will phrase it > somewhat differently, but will end up saying a lot of the same things. > > However, Joe, I think it pays to keep in mind what Georges Gurdjieff said > regarding his experience teaching his philosophy and religion: > The biggest > problem he had was in convincing folks that what they were hearing was > ACTUALLY SOMETHING NEW. > > Reminds me of the recent discussion of DHTML. Sure, DHTML is > just HTML with > a few extra opcodes. Yet it IS something new, because it opens > up whole new > categories of client software. A POV thing. So I don't take Janet's > comments quite so personally. > > > My objection to Janet's post isn't the promotion of LANSA, and that would > have gotten by me if you hadn't astutely pointed it out, Joe. And she did > add "but I know people using almost every tool listed on that > site who claim > their tool of choice is productive and successfully shields them from the > complexity underneath." Janet may, or may not, be expressing her (or her > employer's) personal preference too much. Matters little, to me. > > > But, IMHO, your objections, Joe, to bloatware and turning "the > iSeries into > a big, clunky ODBC server" are EXTREMELY pointed. > > But I admit, I took a little personal offense at statements like "there a > number of people on this list whose lust after architectural elegance and > purity will always lead them to disdain such tools". I don't lust after > things much, but least of all things would be architectural elegance and > purity. I've worked with, for, and over, many many FPP (prima-donna > programmers). I have no use for that attitude, so find it funny someone > would insinuite that ***I am one***. (I think we both assumed Janet was > referring to us, personally, and she can always say she wasn't.) > > > But rather than emphasize things which I took personally, let me > get to the > meat of the matter. Janet, you wrote "My question is whether our goal > should be the ability to quickly build robust business solutions that > support flexible deployment models (which I continue to assert is possible > and affordable today)". It is the assertion which is patently > false. I say > that, knowing that possible and affordable are two terms > inextricably linked > to POV. > > Affordable? I categorically state that it's not. > > Possible? I think you avoided my original question, which was "What I'm > looking for is C/S and Webprogramming that's as easy as green-screen." I > categorically state that the existing tools are not. > > > I haven't studied LANSA as close as I've studied Synon/Cool. And > it's been > years since I worked with Synon. > > I "categorically state" these things, even though I haven't become as > knowledgable as you are, Janet, based on empirical evidence: If existing > tools met these two requirements, they'd be near-universal. The market > isn't stupid. The existing tools are. Affordable and as easy as > green-screen doesn't exist, or it'd be on every green-screen app, in every > company that pays the interactive "tax". > > > I rest my case. > > > But I will add that I think it's awful daggone funny to "hear" the comment > "And for those of you that have moved on from RPG and DDS, into the brave > new world of Java and XML"... > > Going with Java and XML is not particularly brave, these days, because > that's taking a stand that just about the entire industry supports. You > wanna learn the meaning of the word "brave", Janet...? Try > standing up and > claiming that RPG and DDS are ABSOLUTELY THE BEST TOOLS to create > ***real-world business apps***. Now THAT takes REAL bravery, > Janet, in this > day and age. Few will take that stand, even if they DO believe in it. > Doesn't pay to buck the conventional wisdom, in most cases... > > > Thanks again to both of you. Tried to be gentle in my criticisms... Look > forward to any follow-ups (if any). > > jt > > > "Have a GREAT day...! And a BETTER ONE TOMORROW~~~:-)" (sm) > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com > > [mailto:midrange-l-admin@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Joe Pluta > > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 4:54 PM > > To: midrange-l@midrange.com > > Subject: RE: OO benefits? (was Re: Fast400 Value to iSeries community is > > less than zero ) > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: jkrueger@andrewscg.com > > > > > > Of course there a number of people on this list > > > whose lust after > > > architectural elegance and purity will always lead them to > > > disdain such tools; > > > after all, if business programming was actually easy, who would > > > need programming > > > gurus??? > > > > Oh, this is an inflammatory and self-serving comment if ever I saw one. > > Those of us who actually have published freeware and devoted > > countless hours > > to the propagation of architecture which you disdainfully call > > "elegant and > > pure", but which we call "correct", would be offended were the > motivation > > not so transparent. > > > > Some people think the move towards bloatware is hastened by code > > generators > > such as LANSA; that argument has been overdone here and > > elsewhere, mostly by > > me. It is indeed my opinion that the entire software > development process > > needs to be rethought before we turn the iSeries into a big, clunky ODBC > > server. Then there are those who wish to simply fulfill RFPs > > with no regard > > to the direction of the platform. Each type of consultant has > their place > > in the world. > > > > But to intimate that we who promote proper architecture are doing > > it solely > > to keep ourselves in business, while in the nearly the same > > breath promoting > > your favorite code generator, smacks just a bit of "she doth protest too > > much". > > > > Joe Pluta > > Architect and Proud Of It > > www.plutabrothers.com > > Adapting Tomorrow's Architectures to Today's Applications > > > > _______________________________________________ > > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) > > mailing list > > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com > > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l > > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com > > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. > > > > _______________________________________________ > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) > mailing list > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.