|
> -----Original Message----- > From: jkrueger@andrewscg.com > > Of course there a number of people on this list > whose lust after > architectural elegance and purity will always lead them to > disdain such tools; > after all, if business programming was actually easy, who would > need programming > gurus??? Oh, this is an inflammatory and self-serving comment if ever I saw one. Those of us who actually have published freeware and devoted countless hours to the propagation of architecture which you disdainfully call "elegant and pure", but which we call "correct", would be offended were the motivation not so transparent. Some people think the move towards bloatware is hastened by code generators such as LANSA; that argument has been overdone here and elsewhere, mostly by me. It is indeed my opinion that the entire software development process needs to be rethought before we turn the iSeries into a big, clunky ODBC server. Then there are those who wish to simply fulfill RFPs with no regard to the direction of the platform. Each type of consultant has their place in the world. But to intimate that we who promote proper architecture are doing it solely to keep ourselves in business, while in the nearly the same breath promoting your favorite code generator, smacks just a bit of "she doth protest too much". Joe Pluta Architect and Proud Of It www.plutabrothers.com Adapting Tomorrow's Architectures to Today's Applications
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.