|
Friends, My understanding is that IBM is experiencing its greatest revenue growth in services, not hardware or software. It is also my understanding that IBM is among the largest suppliers of Microsoft-related services in the world. While I may not be absolutely correct, I believe that there is some truth there and that an IBM Sales Representative who is more interested in revenue than customer service would recommend a Microsoft solution if there was a good chance that IBM would get the services contract. I also believe that IBM management would thank them for their efforts. Andy Nolen-Parkhouse > On Behalf Of Reeve Fritchman > Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 7:36 PM > > No, no, no! TCO covers everything, including power, insurance, > depreciation, software, communications, and people. Instead of a staff of > 20 (for NT) you need a staff of 6 (iBox); these bodies are purchased on > the > open market and have nothing to do with IBM; this is where the big savings > is. The hardware TCO may be the same or higher for the iBox; it's > certainly > front-end-loaded (high purchase price) and this fact has an unfavorable > financial impact. A lot depends on the PC configuration and how you > compare > apples to oranges. A PC network configured to provide iSeries reliability > will have plenty of extra hardware, software, and administrative costs. > > If you're talking about multiple remote locations, NT costs can skyrocket > because of the possible requirement for servers and licenses at each > remote > location, instead of a simple switch/LAN setup. Your mileage may vary, > but > if you're a trucking company with 10-50 small (3-10 users) offices spread > out everywhere, the hardware (and application) setup gets very complex. A > simple DSL line may not be adequate, either...green screen has its merits: > it gets the job done. > > Behalf Of Leif Svalgaard > Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:18 PM > > exactly, the lower the TCO is, the less money for IBM, so ... > > From: Tony Pack <tony.pack@dixiegroup.com> > Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:15 AM > > > No, IBM wants to sell the X-series. The real money to be made is in > > software and services. Can't make much money on the 400 since it does > not > > need the level of service that a PC server does. > > Tony Pack
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.