×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




Friends,

My understanding is that IBM is experiencing its greatest revenue growth
in services, not hardware or software.  It is also my understanding that
IBM is among the largest suppliers of Microsoft-related services in the
world.  While I may not be absolutely correct, I believe that there is
some truth there and that an IBM Sales Representative who is more
interested in revenue than customer service would recommend a Microsoft
solution if there was a good chance that IBM would get the services
contract.

I also believe that IBM management would thank them for their efforts.

Andy Nolen-Parkhouse

> On Behalf Of Reeve Fritchman
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 7:36 PM
>
> No, no, no!  TCO covers everything, including power, insurance,
> depreciation, software, communications, and people.  Instead of a
staff of
> 20 (for NT) you need a staff of 6 (iBox); these bodies are purchased
on
> the
> open market and have nothing to do with IBM; this is where the big
savings
> is.  The hardware TCO may be the same or higher for the iBox; it's
> certainly
> front-end-loaded (high purchase price) and this fact has an
unfavorable
> financial impact.  A lot depends on the PC configuration and how you
> compare
> apples to oranges.  A PC network configured to provide iSeries
reliability
> will have plenty of extra hardware, software, and administrative
costs.
>
> If you're talking about multiple remote locations, NT costs can
skyrocket
> because of the possible requirement for servers and licenses at each
> remote
> location, instead of a simple switch/LAN setup.  Your mileage may
vary,
> but
> if you're a trucking company with 10-50 small (3-10 users) offices
spread
> out everywhere, the hardware (and application) setup gets very
complex.  A
> simple DSL line may not be adequate, either...green screen has its
merits:
> it gets the job done.
>
> Behalf Of Leif Svalgaard
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:18 PM
>
> exactly, the lower the TCO is, the less money for IBM, so ...
>
> From: Tony Pack <tony.pack@dixiegroup.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:15 AM
>
> > No,  IBM wants to sell the X-series.  The real money to be made is
in
> > software and services.  Can't make much money on the 400 since it
does
> not
> > need the level of service that a PC server does.
> > Tony Pack



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.