RISC to CISC ? and TCP/IP ?

1. I have a client that will be migrating to a 510 from an E70 soon. I'm
not doing the migrate, but a question came up I want to make sure of.
The client was questioning a vendor about observability of thier
code(it's not). The answer from the vendor was something to the effect
of THAT'S NOT A PROBLEM ANYMORE. Best I can tell it must have
observability to migrate. If they supply new code in RISC format then we
don't care. Right ?

2. Different client at 3.2 wants to use "native" TCP/IP and WIN95CA(no
router) to access the 400. My understanding is things like Telnet, FTP
and the like will work, but CA needs the router like the NSRouter for it
to work. Right? Wrong? Half right?

Thanks
-- 
Kirk Goins
Gresham, Oregon
EMAIL kgoins@ix.netcom.com              
      kirk_goins@compuserve.com

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com
|    and specify 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---