× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Alternatively: Use QUSRNOMAX which will run the job in QUSRWRK. That's
more or less what that queue was delivered by IBM for.

The bigger consideration is what memory the job is using. Running in QINTER
it most likely be using shared pool *INTERACT. When run from QUSRWRK it
will use *BASE (all as defaults from IBM). I don't know how intensive this
job gets but is sounds like a better fit for QUSRWRK that QINTER.

If you want the commands needed to split this work out in QBATCH (as has
been suggested) or change the memory the job runs in contact me privately.

--
Jim Oberholtzer
Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects


-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bruce
Barrett
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 4:01 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: running batch jobs from QINTER

Use jobq QTXTSRCH

"Lindstrom, Scott R." <Scott.Lindstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 8/28/2014
1:51 PM >>>
Then wouldn't it be better to create a new JOBQ under QBATCH that is
*not* single threaded?

Running batch work in an interactive subsystem is just a bad idea.

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Hoteltravelfundotcom
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 3:43 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: running batch jobs from QINTER

Is there any performance issue at all
running batch job in QINTER session. the job will take about 20 seconds to
run,

I would make it in a loop to run every few minutes. until I complete the
view that would negate the need for this run.

I would have it close itself every night and a scheduled job kick it off in
the morning.

The reason I dont want to put this in batch is because, the batch queues are
single threaded so you can't hold up the others. and there are jobs that
need to run before the daily IPL - if they dont the machine won't come up.
So am very afridai to mess around there.
--

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe,
or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe,
or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.