Remember Neil, they always say their numbers are based
on a maxed system and anything less, "might" offer slightly
different results.
I still think a 4 drive system mirrored is the way to go.
Neil Palmer/DPS wrote:
Thanks for the heads up. Wonder if IBM have checked this in the Lab or if
the poor performance in that configuration is only on an 8xx system and
not a 520. If the performance is that bad on a 520 there's obviously
something seriously wrong with the 3 disk RAID setup and if they can't
improve on that they shouldn't be selling systems that way.
