MIDRANGE-L » October 2004

Re: very low end i5 performance

Subject: Re: very low end i5 performance
From: Pat Barber <mboceanside@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 16:15:54 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

From a cost stand point, four drives mirrored would
be the best bet and performance wouldn't take such a
hit... Raid gets kinda pricey in low end boxes.

I assume you can put four drives in main box
with no extra stuff.

This thread ...

Re: very low end i5 performance, (continued)
- Re: very low end i5 performance , Pete Massiello
- Re: very low end i5 performance , Al Barsa
- Re: very low end i5 performance , Neil Palmer/DPS

References:
- Re: very low end i5 performance , Neil Palmer/DPS
- Re: very low end i5 performance , Jim Franz

Prev by Author: Font Changes on HPT
Next by Author: Re: CPYF question
Previous by thread: Re: very low end i5 performance
Next by thread: Re: very low end i5 performance
Index(es):

Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2013 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact