× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



That matches my experience more Brad - admittedly mostly with "regular" URLs rather than web services specifically - case sensitivity just seems completely pointless to me. I'm never going to have upper and lower case versions of the same name.



Jon Paris

www.partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com

On Nov 21, 2018, at 1:53 PM, Bradley Stone <bvstone@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Agreed... And if there's one thing IBM does, it's follow the RFCs to a T,
even if most others don't and the RFC isn't generally accepted.

Bradley V. Stone
www.bvstools.com
MAILTOOL Benefit #3 <https://www.bvstools.com/mailtool.html>: No 400 byte
or less message limit as with SNDDST or SNDSMTPEMM.

On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 11:39 AM Nadir Amra <amra@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

This how applications are deployed in any application server. Nothing
new.

Take for example, Google, which seems to operate a case-sensitive URL
policy on their own URLs. For example, the second link below is a 404:

http://google.com/doodles
http://google.com/Doodles

Not sure what you mean about "....have to remember...". It has always
been the case.

RFC 3986 defines URIs as case-sensitive except for the scheme and host
components.

Having said that, one could always manipulate the HTTP configuration to
map URLs any way you want. So you could define you web services as lower
case, then create a mapping such that any requests that come in is lower
cased before forwarding on to be processed.



"WEB400" <web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 11/21/2018 11:16:40 AM:

From: Jon Paris <jon.paris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Web400@Midrange. Web400" <web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 11/21/2018 11:17 AM
Subject: Re: [WEB400] Setting up a web services server, and services
Sent by: "WEB400" <web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Not related to Booth's question but re: "URL context root is case
sensitive. "

Why did IBM choose to do this ? To have to remember that one
service in many that may be deployed is case-sensitive is (to put it
mildly) annoying.



--
This is the Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (WEB400) mailing
list
To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/web400.


--
This is the Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (WEB400) mailing list
To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/web400.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.