No, I’m not set on using node. We are looking at IWS, Java and JT400, IBM Connect, and even IBM Cloud with an IBM i connector. We are just less interested in CGI solutions.
This happened to be a node conversation because of my original question.
I would love to know about any evidence (other than anecdotal) that CGI on the IBM i can scale equally well as node on the IBM i. That might make CGI solutions more appealing to us.
Thanks,
Kelly Cookson
IT Project Leader
Dot Foods, Inc.
217-773-4486 ext. 12676
www.dotfoods.com<
http://www.dotfoods.com>
From: WEB400 [mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bradley Stone
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 10:23 AM
To: Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) <web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [WEB400] [EXTERNAL] Re: ibm_db node module and IBM Data Server Driver
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Kelly Cookson <KCookson@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:KCookson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>
wrote:
Hi Bradley,
People don't choose node for performance. Not saying it's poor
performance. They choose it because maybe all they can find are Node
Programmers, or they're locked into using OSS for one reason or another.
I just don’t think that’s right. Node is new.
Node is Javascript. not new. :)
But, it is getting better all the time. Just like RPG.
It sounds like you've made up your mind. No sense listening to us on the
list with years of experience if you're that set on using Node. I like
Node too, but I don't force it to fit where I may feel something may be
better.
--
This is the Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (WEB400) mailing list
To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400<
https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at
https://archive.midrange.com/web400<
https://archive.midrange.com/web400>.
midrange.com
