|
Hi Thorbjørn;In that case I believe that the way to monetize is to provide support and expert consultants. I don't know though.
I'm on the same page as you regarding that "we don’t loose copyright".
However, I think that the RPG world is too small to both a
Commercial-IceBreak and an Open-IceBreak under GPL. Maybe I'm wrong here,
but if the Open-IceBreak kicks off, we (S&M) don’t stand a chance with the
commercial version.
Also - as Matt refer to:(or at is least viewed as) an anti-commercial political statement as it is aI would be very wary of a GPL license. For better or for worse, GPL is
distribution license. We do have a little bit of GPL code here but we don't
modify it so for us, GPL isn't much better than closed source commercial
software<<
So I would rather have one strong product, controlled from with in a
community.... this is just my initial thoughts.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.