× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Hi Thorbjørn;


I'm on the same page as you regarding that "we don?t loose copyright".
However, I think that the RPG world is too small to both a
Commercial-IceBreak and an Open-IceBreak under GPL. Maybe I'm wrong here,
but if the Open-IceBreak kicks off, we (S&M) don?t stand a chance with the
commercial version.

Also - as Matt refer to:
I would be very wary of a GPL license. For better or for worse, GPL is
(or at is least viewed as) an anti-commercial political statement as it is a
distribution license. We do have a little bit of GPL code here but we don't
modify it so for us, GPL isn't much better than closed source commercial
software<<

So I would rather have one strong product, controlled from with in a
community.... this is just my initial thoughts.


Best regards


Niels Liisberg
IceBreak Chief SW Architect

System & Metode Technologies
Håndværkersvinget 8, DK-2970 Hørsholm
Phone: +45 70 20 36 10
Fax: +45 70 20 30 11
Direct: +45 45 177 055
Mobile: +45 31 158 861
E-mail: nli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web: www.system-method.com and www.Icebreak.org




-----Original Message-----
From: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
Sent: 11. juni 2008 17:50
To: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries
Subject: Re: [WEB400] Thinking out loud about a new RPG web framework

Haas, Matt (CL Tech Sv) skrev den 11-06-2008 17:14:
I would be very wary of a GPL license. For better or for worse, GPL is (or
at is least viewed as) an anti-commercial political statement as it is a
distribution license. We do have a little bit of GPL code here but we don't
modify it so for us, GPL isn't much better than closed source commercial
software (the obvious advantage being we can look at source when needed for
debugging). IMHO, the Apache license is a much better corporate fit.

Some companies have decided on GPL for the OpenSource version and that
you can buy a version not under GPL (which is one way to monetize). As
Open Source does not mean that you loose copyright the owners can do
what they want with their code (at this point).

Would that be an option?


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.