|
Hi, Jon. I don't disagree with you at all. However, the price of RDi is a
stumbling block for some. I know there are many reasoned arguments as to why
the cost is high, relative to other Windows products. Despite this, at the
end of the day, the product is not enjoying as wide an audience as it
should. (Adopting RDP/RDi should be a no-brainer.)
I appreciate there is the 60-trial available. However, this is a little like
having a track day in a Ferrari - a wonderful experience but difficult to
justify owning one. (OK, perhaps not the best example.)
I'm sure most of us have used free software, usually "lite" versions of full
products. If the "lite" version proves to be particularly valuable, we'll
stump up for the full version, maybe to overcome limitations or to take
advantage of the extra features. I'll admit I cannot see IBM ever adopting
this with RDi - but it doesn't hurt to wonder, "what if", eh?
Finally, let me pose this one: how would plumbers or carpenters react if
they had to purchase new tools every couple of years_and_ pay an annual fee
for the privilege of using them? (I guess it depends on the price.)
Brian Parkins.
From: Jon Paris
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2013 8:48 PM
On 2013-06-24, at 11:26 AM, Brian Parkins<goodprophet.bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:>>What you're talking about is what RPGNextGen does Brian - the only thing
>>they have missing is the syntax checker.
>>Perhaps what we should ask IBM to do is make the RPG syntax checker
>>available FOC for others to incorporate?
>>However, as a freelancer I can never understand why we think we should not
>>pay for our own tools? When was the last time any of us hired a plumber or
>>carpenter (or car mechanic for that matter) and had him turn up with no
>>tools >>and expecting to use ours? I see no reason why the freelancer
>>should not provide his own copy - and in most cases it is a fully
>>deductible expense.
<snip/)
</snip>>>This is just fanciful musing on my part. Do you think there would be a
>>demand for a FREE “RDi Lite” product from IBM? (Not suggesting it is ever
>>likely to happen.) If so, what features would you suggest they leave out
>>in this “lite” version?
>--
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.