Re: New RFE - Outline Parameter sorting -- WDSCI-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

I agree also with Stuart!

2012/7/11 Brian Johnson <brian.johnson.mn@xxxxxxxxx>

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Stuart Rowe <rowestu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Container names (procedures, subroutines, structures, files, the

top-level

stuff) should be listed in alpha order, sub-elements (data structure
subfields, fields in records) in declaration order.

Is there anyone who wants the parameters to be sorted alphabetically?
Should we always keep them in source order?
Edmund (E.H.) Reinhardt
COBOL IDE on AIX, DDS, WebFacing, System i Application Development,
Rational Developer for Power

I'm in agreement with Stuart.

--
Brian Johnson
brian.johnson.mn@xxxxxxxxx
--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio
Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.