Re: RdI vs SEU -- WDSCI-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: RdI vs SEU
From: David Gibbs <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:10:24 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l>
List-help: <mailto:wdsci-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client for System i & iSeries <wdsci-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:wdsci-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l>, <mailto:wdsci-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l>, <mailto:wdsci-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On 3/15/2010 7:05 PM, Joe Pluta wrote:

Sadly, I can't agree entirely with that ... RDi / RDp have a long way to go when it comes to CL. That's primarily what I use SEU for now.

What's your biggest complaint? The auto-correct, or the line length?

Speed ... WDSC, RDi, & RDp, all take a huge amount of time parsing large, pre-formatted, CL lines. The editor will hang up for 30-45 seconds on each edit of a statement.

david

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: RdI vs SEU , Joe Pluta

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.