|
In my session at Rational, George Farr asked the audience who thought
that having RDi on Linux was important. Only one or two hands went
up. Although this really wasn't a session on RDi, it was on RDi-SOA,
and the audience was more non-i people than i people, it was still a
little surprising to me.
I then began to wonder whether my own personal anti-Microsoft bias is
really skewing my perception. Personally, if I were running an IT
department I'd be very interested in a pure Linux network. With the
exception of a couple of specific-use programs, I don't use
Windows-only products anymore and I'm pretty happy. My biggest issue
today is that I have to use Windows for RDi.
On a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being very important and 1 being not
important at all, how would you rate the importance of having RDi
running on Linux?
Joe
--
This is the Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries (WDSCI-L)
mailing list To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.