×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Jeff Crosby wrote:
Isn't RDI the replacement for WDSC? Here's part of the transcript. I
snipped out questions not related to ADTS, WDSC, & RDI. It definitely
sounds like it's going to cost us money.
Okay, here's the current situation. I will write about this in detail
next week.
1. There are now five separate components: two compiler versions (ILE
and "heritage" or legacy), and three tools versions (ADTS, RDi, RDi-SOA).
2. Based on your tier, you are automatically entitled to X seats of ILE,
heritage and ADTS.
Okay, here's what is not clear. There is no current upgrade path from
ADTS to RDi, but the folks we talked to (including George) insisted they
thought it was a good idea and they would establish one. The upgrade
path should be zero-cost. IBM made it very clear this was their
direction, and Todd Britton has said clearly that an upgrade path "is
being considered". If they choose not to do so, then you as the users
need to complain long and hard.
There is no WDSC anymore. WDSC is out of marketing and will be out of
support in two years. To get similar functionality, you need RDi-SOA.
The good news is that RDi-SOA will contain EGL, the bad news is that it
might not contain all the other J2EE support.
Joe
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
