|
wdsci-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
6. Re: New Release? (Duane Kehoe) Try ~$4600 for AE according to the website, I am about to bring that to my boss and see how quickly he starts laughing me out of the office. And the part that gets me is it is a tech preview, ie beta, shouldn't that be provided free so it can get tested better. Kind of funny to me IBM is trying something not even M$ will openly try - selling a beta. I know we could debate the gold status of most of M$ software but at least they now provide a public beta free of charge. Not really sure about the logic behind this one from IBM's point of view??
Since I'm certain that /I/ won't be paying for it at that price even though we'll probably be using it in the office, I can look at it from various sides...
From the boss' perspective, some of it should be thought of like "Will it save more than 3 hours of one developer's time every week?" I mean, at $30/hr., $4600 is less than $90/wk. Does it increase productivity enough?
Even for a tech preview, it can easily be worth spending a fraction of a developer's annual salary /if/ it actually makes a significant difference. Unfortunately, until we all see what it can do, it's guesswork.
Tom Liotta
albartell wrote: How much more is AE? I can understand IBM's need to make some extra bling (I said bling ;-) for more advanced features (don't know if these features qualify for that or not), but if it is in the neighborhood of $2500 then I can tell you that I won't be getting' it.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.