|
Randy, > What version did you purchase under, what version and service > pack level are you > on now? we purchased Style v3.5.0. and upgraded to v3.5.2 prior to going live and currently are running sp2 with ptf and some mods. > In the contract did the language imply or state the right of > source code for all > future releases? Allow me to quote the contract and you make this call "14. Source code provision The customer has the right to use certain source code for the software products licensed under this agreement and shown on the attached software products schedules with the following provisions: a) JBA retains all right to deviate works and modifications performed by the customer using the software products at their basis. b) the customer warrants to JBA that such source code will be made available only to its programmers and technical staff on a need to know basis. c) the source code will be kept in a secured environment. d) JBA will not provided source code for any products which JBA is licensed by others to resell nor for any JBA systems management or development tools." there are other provisions in the contract for new releases which do not specifically say and source but our reading of this says if we get the licensed product we get the source for it also. > > Having the "right" and obtaining may be different things. Yes you are correct and you are right, as rush is fond of saying. However you cannot use what you do not have. so Right to use implies you must have access to, weather I have it or it is online some where I can accesses it and use it from there is of little importance. > > Have you applied "Service Pack 3" or later PTF's over 3.5.2 and > did they contain > source code? > No, sp3 is in our future still. Most likely will skip it in favor or sp4. we have some post live roll outs that would be impacted if we tried to put sp3 in at this time. I have been assured by my project manager that we will get source with sp3 if we got it at this time. I however know how the right and left hand thing works. If we got sp3 or any release and it did not have source it would be refused and remain uninstalled until source is made available. I know how this next statement will be taken but we have, did, and will recompile each source we receive to verify the source we received matches the object delivered. Just the receipt of a file that says source is meaningless to us, if the object is suppose to do function A and the compiled source is doing something else it is of no use to us. Our original delivery had 5-8% depending on how you look at things, source code and object mismatches. Most were minor things but there were several that we went around and around with JBA people until we received valid source code for the object delivered. Meaning in one case they pulled a source from another release to get the correct source and in another the developer had failed to publish the correct source to the object. There were other situations I am not sure I know them all, end result we got the correct matching source for our objects. Charles Greene Miller Curtain Co. Inc. +--- | This is the JBA Software Users Mailing List! | To submit a new message send your mail to JBAUSERS-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to JBAUSERS-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to JBAUSERS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: doug333@aol.com. +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.