RE: [Security400] QINACTITV does not appear to be working

["Bale, Dan" <D.Bale@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Wow, good memory, Chuck!  Actually, Neil's backup stuff is so detailed
that I haven't had time to dissect it thoroughly.  Additionally, I am
lacking a good test box to test this on.

But I don't remember seeing any TFRJOB in his code.  I just now verified
that he's not doing it in the code I have from him.  But he has clearly
indicated that this is a non-restricted state
save-everything-that-can-be-saved backup.

Dan Bale
IT - AS/400
Handleman Company
248-362-4400  Ext. 4952
D.Bale@Handleman.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chuck Lewis [SMTP:clewis@iquest.net]
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 8:51 AM
> To:   security400@midrange.com
> Subject:      Re: [Security400] QINACTITV does not appear to be
> working
>
> Sure you can Dan,
>
> Haven't you bounced messages back and forth with Neil Palmer on his
> save stuff ? It does
> that very thing !
>
> Chuck
>
> "Bale, Dan" wrote:
>
> > This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> > --
> > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> > Now that you've expanded my horizons here, I have to ask.  I'm
> wondering
> > (but not too optimistic, since I've never heard this done before)
> about
> > whether you can take the system to a restricted state after you've
> done
> > a TFRJOB QCTL and do a Save-21 or other restricted-system stuff.
> >
> > I'm sure the answer's no, but I'd be wondering at 3 a.m. tonight if
> I
> > didn't ask.  What a life, eh? <g>
> >
> > Dan Bale
> > IT - AS/400
> > Handleman Company
> > 248-362-4400  Ext. 4952
> > D.Bale@Handleman.com