|
>From an interactive job, yes. From a batch job, no. I tried so many different ways to do this from a batch job, so I wouldn't have to wait til 7:00 when everyone logged out of the system to end it to a restricted stand, and run the job that ran the backup. Couldn't do it in a batch job, but I could do it from a CL running in an interactive job. If you are asking what command is behind the save-21 on the menu, I don't know. Regards, Jim Langston Programmer/Analyst Cels Enterprises, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: security400-admin@midrange.com [mailto:security400-admin@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Bale, Dan Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 1:09 PM To: security400@midrange.com Subject: RE: [Security400] QINACTITV does not appear to be working This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Now that you've expanded my horizons here, I have to ask. I'm wondering (but not too optimistic, since I've never heard this done before) about whether you can take the system to a restricted state after you've done a TFRJOB QCTL and do a Save-21 or other restricted-system stuff. I'm sure the answer's no, but I'd be wondering at 3 a.m. tonight if I didn't ask. What a life, eh? <g> Dan Bale IT - AS/400 Handleman Company 248-362-4400 Ext. 4952 D.Bale@Handleman.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Buck Calabro [SMTP:Buck.Calabro@commsoft.net] > Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 3:51 PM > To: security400@midrange.com > Subject: RE: [Security400] QINACTITV does not appear to be > working > > >A good idea, but I was under the impression > >that TFRJOB was strictly a batch function. > > Nope. > > >You even mention the QCTL jobq. So, presuming > >you've done this <g>, can you give more details on this? > > It's easier to do than to explain. Get to a command line and TFRJOB > QCTL. > Your job will re-route through the QCTL job queue which, presumably is > connected to subsystem QCTL. Do a WRKACTJOB SBS(QCTL) and you should > see > yourself there. Easy as can be! > > >Am I correct to assume that this method wouldn't > >help me if I'm not already signed on when QINTER is ended? > > Right. It requires a bit of planning. > > >Sounds like Evan's method would allow > >me to sign on even if QINTER is ended. > > Right again. I was just looking at things from the security angle, > that's > all. I haven't tried, but I strongly suspect that you could readily > create > a second subsystem (Evan's method) and secure the job queue from all > but > your authorised users. Forget about the specific workstation entries; > let > any device in. > > I'll tinker in a moment and let you know how it turns out. > > Buck _______________________________________________ This is the Security Administration on the AS400 / iSeries (Security400) mailing list To post a message email: Security400@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/security400 or email: Security400-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/security400.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.