|
Subroutines should be used to modularize code in a program/module. A subroutine would have code so specific to a business function that it would not be shared between other program/modules. A subprocedure would have code that should be shared between different program/modules. On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 13:25:24 -0500, "Bruce Guetzkow" <bruceg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said: > This sounds like an area where there isn't a standard (or at least it > isn't clear). IMHO, the worst situation would be having a source member > with both subroutines and sub-procedures in them. While functional, > this would be confusing. > > Since there is a difference of opinion, possible solutions might be: > - if source has subroutines, continue to use subroutines > - if source has sub-procedures, continue to use sub-procedures > ** or ** > Perhaps an edict from the Standards-God to use one or the other? It > would seem logical that someone needs to make a decision at some point, > or agree to disagree. > > I have the distinct advantage of being the development team, so when I > encounter a situation, I can make a decision and stick to it until I > decide something else is better, at which point I make another decision. > I have been in your situation as well and don't lightly make the "edict" > case. Sometimes, however, that is the only way...even if it isn't my > method that is chosen. > > > >from: "Lim Hock-Chai" <Lim.Hock-Chai@xxxxxxxx> > > >We do have a group of developers/Managers that govern and set standard > for the shop. The example you have about setting standard for >/free is > pretty straight forward. However, it is not the case for sub-procedure. > Some developers like sub-routine. For them sub- > >procedure is not as readable as sub-routine. And of course, there is > another group that think sub-procedure is better and more > >readable. What you end up with is one group keep pushing sub-routine > into program and the other keep pushing sub-procedure. > > FWIW... > Bruce Guetzkow > Information Services Director > United Credit Service, Inc. > Phone: 262-723-2902 > Fax: 262-723-5568 > Email: bruceg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Web: www.unitedcreditservice.com > > > -- > This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing > list > To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l > or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l. > -- michaelr_41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.