|
> From: Scott Klement > > Is it stupid that "long" and "int" are the same thing, but "long long" is > different? Yes. Very much so. But, it's the way that C has evolved. Be > glad you're an RPG programmer :) Thanks, Scott. I count my lucky stars every day <grin>. > The best source is Barbara Morris' write-up, here: > http://www.opensource400.org/callc.html Damn. I should have guessed that Barbara would have concise, well-written information out there. I could have just Google'd on Barbara Morris Convert Prototypes. > I should mention that I've never used either of the above resources, as > I'm fluent in both languages. I've only looked at them because I get this > question fairly regularly. ;) I'm relatively fluent myself in most programming languages, but in C and its derivatives different compilers have different size definitions, and I was unfamiliar with the word sizes on the AS/... iSer... er, i5. The big problem for me was that IBM APIs tend to use both "int" and "long int" all over the place, and so I was confused (especially late at night). > That's really foolish, considering that C programmers are such a > gross minority on the iSeries. But, what do I know? IBM is infinite in > it's wisdom. Say it with me, Scott... "i5", "i5", "i5". <grin> Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.