RE: Difference bet. Primary and Full procedural file.

["Peter Colpaert" <Peter.Colpaert@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Martin,

I agree that it is possibly faster than a DIY-program with read loops, but
if it means that new people (who will be less and less familiar with the
RPG cycle as time goes on) can read and understand the flow of a program in
less time, I vote against using the cycle and level breaks.

Just my personal opinion (everybody can start shooting ...  now <ducking>)

Peter Colpaert
Application Developer

Honda Europe NV
Langerbruggestraat 104
B-9000 GENT
Peter.Colpaert@honda-eu.com
Tel: +32 9 2501 334
Fax: +32 9 2501 231
----------
"Bones! Help this man, he's injured!" "Damn it Jim, I'm a doctor not a ...
oh, ummm, yeah."
----------




"Booth Martin" <Booth@MartinVT.com>@midrange.com on 22/05/2002 14:58:25
Please respond to rpg400-l@midrange.com
Sent by:  rpg400-l-admin@midrange.com

To:   <rpg400-l@midrange.com>

cc:

Subject:  RE: Difference bet. Primary and Full procedural file.


While you  avoid it like the plague I like and use both methods.  On a
recent assignment I was asked to not use the cycle because none of the new
people understood it.

I was able to replace 4 simple lines of I-specs (L1 & M1) with several
layers of ReadE-loops in the calc specs.  What is really a mainline of under
10 lines became 30+ lines.

I'd agree that people avoid it like the plague, but that is fear of the
unknown and has no basis in complexity.

when you need to process a lot of records and performance is an issue
UpdatePrimary with no K was, for many years, unbeatable.  Lately I have
heard that's no longer true but I do not have facts for either case.

(Just testing
-----------------------------------------------
Booth Martin ResoDirect, ext. 528
BMartin@ResoDirect.com
Booth@MartinVT.com
http://www.MartinVT.com
-----------------------------------------------





______________________________________________________________________
The information contained in this communication is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or
the entity to whom it is addressed and others authorised to receive it. If
you have received it by mistake, please let the sender know by e-mail reply
and delete it from your system.
If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance of the
contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
Honda Europe NV is neither liable for the proper and complete transmission
of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its
receipt.