× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



--

>Carel,
>
>Double check that indicator 97 is in the proper column.  My guess is that it
>is in the wrong spot.  Or better yet, use the %found bif instead of the
>indicator.
>
>Scott Mildenberger

Scott,

You were right: we placed indicator 97 in the Error column and were very
consistent with that, too.

I think it strange: whether you use the BIF and leave the indicators out or
fill in an indicator in the Error column, both methods are accepted by the
syntax checker; only placing the resulting indicator  of the read/chain
action in the wrong column will the syntax checker signal an error.

Methinks, this is a bug: if you use a resulting indicator, the syntax
checker should check wheter  the right column is filled, or not. Leaving
out any indicator assumes you are going to use the (right) BIF.

Regards,

Carel Teijgeler.
--




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.