|
-- Joep, Replies in line Carel Teijgeler >The syntax checker is not a feature of RPG, but of SEU. I know. Perhaps I should have written "With RPG III ...." >And although it is quite good at checking the syntax, it can only flag >errors. Not coding any >result indicator is not an error in RPG IV; nor is coding only an error >indicator. This is only since the read-BIFs are introduced in RPG (release V4R5M0 ??). Before that SEU would have flagged the error (or missing indicator), as it was required then. >Now, if the syntax checker were configurable, you might configure it to >not accept just an error indicator, but, alas, it isn't. I am aware that the syntax checker in SEU have to do a condiotional check: If any resulting indicators are used, check for errors, otherwise ignore. This may be difficult to implement and the checking is done on the wrong indicator column in stead of the required indicator column. --
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.