× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: RE: What bugs you about KLISTs in RPG IV?
  • From: Colin Williams <Williamsc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 09:28:21 +0100

Im assuming that backward-compatibility would mean you still have the
option to use KLIST

-----Original Message-----
From: R. Bruce Hoffman, Jr. [mailto:rbruceh@ibm.net]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 1999 7:13 PM
To: RPG400-L@midrange.com
Subject: Re: What bugs you about KLISTs in RPG IV?


boldt@ca.ibm.com wrote:
> 
> about KLISTs is that they are necessary at all! If we weren't
> limited to 14 chars in Factor 1, we would be able to list the
> keys directly in the CHAIN opcode.  Imagine for a moment:
> 
>      cf   chain (custno: acctno: date) mastfile
> 
> or even:
> 
>      cf  chain (prodno: 'X' + subcode(n+14)) mastfile
> 
> In other words, full expressions coded directly as key fields
> for the keyed I/O operations!

Oh boy.  NO.

But then again YES.

It would depend on the coder.  Remember that we spend 90% of the
program's life in maintenance.  This method would allow a programmer
(and you better believe that they would do this) to scatter this stuff
all over the program.  Every CHAIN op would have to be visited for key
information if the keys changed.  The only way around that (and I know
of VERY few programmers that do this) is to code every CHAIN as a
subroutine or procedure and isolate the key list to that subroutine or
procedure.

So on second thought...  probably, but no.

-- 
===========================================================
R. Bruce Hoffman, Jr.
 -- IBM Certified AS/400 Professional System Administrator
 -- IBM Certified AS/400 Professional Network Administrator

"The sum of all human knowledge is a fixed constant.
    It's the population that keeps growing!"
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
*
* This is the RPG/400 Discussion Mailing List!  To submit a new
*
* message, send your mail to "RPG400-L@midrange.com".  To unsubscribe
*
* from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com and specify
*
* 'unsubscribe RPG400-L' in the body of your message.  Questions should
*
* be directed to the list owner / operator: david@midrange.com
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* This is the RPG/400 Discussion Mailing List!  To submit a new         *
* message, send your mail to "RPG400-L@midrange.com".  To unsubscribe   *
* from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com and specify       *
* 'unsubscribe RPG400-L' in the body of your message.  Questions should *
* be directed to the list owner / operator: david@midrange.com          *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.