Re: Improving IFS performance with Windows -- MIDRANGE-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Improving IFS performance with Windows
From: Holger Scherer <hs@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 13:35:16 +0200
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.lists.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi Chris,

IFS performance highly depends on disk performance. Read Performance can be ok
when you have a reasonable amount of RAM in your IBM i memory Pool for the
appropriate jobs (usually pool 2).
Write / delete performance simply needs fast disks or better flash.
(this is an architectural issue for IBM i and i already created an RFE for this)...

-h

Am 23.07.2020 um 16:15 schrieb Wyatt, Chris (BWPKG-ROM) via MIDRANGE-L <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

Is there anything we can do to improve IFS performance/response with our Windows network? How can I troubleshoot this?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Improving IFS performance with Windows , Rob Berendt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.