Re: Client Access vs Access Client - 27x132 font size

Yes, I think you're right, Vern.  I just wanted to make sure I was seeing what I thought I was seeing, and this list is incredibly helpful as an extra pair of eyes.

For a number of reasons I haven't been very active in the RFE cycle of late, but between this and some things I see in the SQL parser for RDi, it may be time to break out the old RFE pen again.

IBM can't fix something if they don't know it's broken!

Hi Joe

One aspect of all this might be, ACS is not derived from Personal Communications 5250 (as in Client Access) - I believe it comes through the Host-On-Demand product stream - that is also Java-based and has been around for 10, 15, ?? years.

One reason I say that is the extension on the emulator files - HOD.

It is likely that Host-On-Demand never behaved in every way as PC5250 did. But who among us ever tried HOD other me and the other person? (Just kidding, just kidding!)

I would suggest submitting an RFE and present as justification of this request that if IBM want to give us equivalent functionality, this setting needs to be there.

Cheers
Vern

On 4/11/2018 5:24 PM, Joe Pluta wrote:

-snip-
It doesn't "seem" simple.  It is simple.  I want it to act the way it did before, no matter how much you dislike it.  You are making it more complicated than it is, and to be honest, more complicated than it's worth.  I wanted to respond out of politeness because you've put a lot of effort into your argument, but I sense that I'm edging out of the polite lane, so I'm just going to leave it here.