|
To be clear,
I meant a subroutine *within* a subprocedure.
If you have some repeating code within a subprocedure that clearly belongs
(is specific to) the subprocedure it doesn't make much sense to make it a
full blown subprocedure, thereby falsely communicating that it may be some
generic code which it is not.
Just code a subroutine, which keeps the code clearly as part of the
subprocedure.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.