|
Hi Raul
Easy esquire programs?
Alan Shore
E-mail : ASHORE@xxxxxxxx
Phone [O] : (631) 200-5019
Phone [C] : (631) 880-8640
‘If you're going through hell, keep going.’
Winston Churchill
-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Raul Jager
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 8:13 AM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Moving from Green screen app to GUI because of push back
You do not need to pay any extra to replace the green screen with the web for your users. There is a learning to do, once you learn enough to do basic web programs, you will never want to develop a green screen application again. And your users will not want it either.
Go hybrid, do some easy esquire programs to replace a frequently used green screen. Don has mention the 80 / 20 rule. You do not need to replace all at once. Do not even try.
On 12/13/2017 03:45 AM, Booth Martin wrote:
I understand this sentiment and for a while agreed. Then I decided
to see just what could be done with the iSeries with freely available
tools and current baseline technologies. That exercise changed my
mind. Put it another way: what can programmers everywhere do today
on other cross-platform applications that they can not do on the iSeries?
If we remove ourselves from the Microsoft & Apple platform, are we
stuck? Is there enough good stuff out there that we can function just
fine without Word & Excel?
On 12/12/2017 9:39 PM, mlazarus wrote:
Tim,
I was discussing this subject recently with a very respected member
of this group. We were both confused how turning over a crucial,
and I do mean crucial to the longevity of the system, piece of
creating a modern UI is turned over to third party vendors instead
of being fully integrated and included in the OS.
Some vendors have done an admirable job creating a product, but
IMHO, it's ridiculous to have to pay a large bundle extra to get
what should be included and easily integrated into the system. It
is also more expensive to develop using (at least) some of these
tools. My estimate is at least 25% longer to develop and test.
I have three clients that are jumping ship to a PC based platform,
another that has already gone in that direction (they used to have
the largest AS/400 config in the US northeast (which included 14
AS/400's) and another is in the midst of moving part of their
operation to a PC based cloud system. I haven't heard of a new
member to the midrange fold in a long time. I would imagine that
they exist, but I think that 20+ years after the GUI became popular,
for IBM not to include this required functionality, plus the GUI
development tools as part of the base OS, is just plain foolish.
No offense to the tool vendors, but I believe that this
functionality is best integrated at a low level in the OS, not as a
generic API in order to get the best integration, debugging and
performance.
-mark
-- Este e-mail fue enviado desde el Mail Server del diario ABC Color --
-- Verificado por Anti-Virus Corporativo Symantec --
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
